7 Open Source Software Security Risks
Open source software continues to be a popular option for many businesses, not just due to its affordability but also its adaptability and flexibility. However, as with any software, there are associated risks that need to be navigated and managed. This article aims to provide an introductory overview of seven open source security risks.
From the dangers of unpatched vulnerabilities to the potential for legal issues with licenses and other agreements, this will be a great foundation for anyone looking to better understand open source risk management and implementation. Take some time to read through the risks yourself and see how you can put measures in place to protect your organization from potential harm.
What Is Open-Source Software?
Open source software has various associated licenses; its major users are Linux OS, Apache Web Server, WordPress, and Mozilla Firefox. All these programs have been deposited in the ever-expanding ecosystem of open source products.
Security Risks Of Open Source Software
Open source software is open to public scrutiny, meaning anyone can view the code and detect any existing flaws. Moreover, open source programs rely heavily on open access community support and volunteer for security updates and maintenance, making them vulnerable to attacks from malicious actors.
While open source software is incredibly popular, owing to its various advantages, organizations must be aware of some open source security risks. Some of the security risks associated to Open Source Software are:
1. Vulnerabilities Are Public knowledge
For members of an open-source software project, knowledge about potential vulnerabilities in the system spreads quickly. This warning is given to those involved in the project and to outside organizations such as OWASP and NVD, so it's important to stay on top of updates and the newest versions to ensure protection against cybercrime. If you don't stay informed and act accordingly, you risk leaving yourself vulnerable.
2. Lack Of Security Visibility
Open source software comes with the caveat that there may be no legal protection for security, and community support informing you how to utilize it securely can be limited. Moreover, developers liable for creating this type of software are often not security specialists and thus may need to comprehend how to carry out best practices. Furthermore, open-source software necessitates using third-party libraries, which are generally brought in via package managers without prior scrutiny - making the identification process more complex and extensive.
3. Intellectual Property Issues
4. Lack Of Warranty
When utilizing open-source software, it is important to know that these projects do not have any warranties regarding their security, support, or content. Volunteers are often involved in developing and managing these systems, but they have no obligation to continue doing so, which can lead to unexpected gaps in support.
Similarly, when community members contribute code, there is an increased risk that intellectual property rights within the code may have been infringed upon. In such cases, it may be possible for you to be held responsible for using such software – a difficult situation to negotiate without the appropriate legal help.
5. Relaxed Integrations Oversight
Open source components are often used inadequately or mistakenly due to a lack of expertise, organizational communication, monitoring, and documentation. Furthermore, with no built-in regulatory mechanisms like those found in proprietary software, the onus is on the user to check the correct implementation of open source components. That too, in terms of various versions and conflicting functions or license agreement discrepancies. As such, teams need to have thorough review processes when using open-source components for projects, as failing to do so can lead to costly mistakes further down the line.
6. Operational Insufficiencies
The current time crunch has made it exceptionally difficult for teams to take on the extra job of utilizing open-source components and not knowing who is accountable for it. In addition, using these components requires keeping track of versions, their use, and how they might interact with other existing components.
Furthermore, one has to consider the various licenses when evaluating various components and stay updated about updates and patches for them, ensuring that these bring about any benefits. Plus, additional complexity or unnecessary functionality in those components could cause untoward problems without any added advantages.
7. Poor Developer Practices
Developers should be cognizant of the impact on security and licensing when they take the shortcut of copy-pasting code sections from open-source software instead of integrating complete components. Unmonitored adaptations can easily lead to security vulnerabilities or malicious functionality being injected into the codebase. For safe collaboration, it's best practice to use a binary repository manager or shared network location for code transfer rather than plain email.
How To Protect Yourself And Your Organization?
To properly protect yourself and your organization when using open-source software, it is important to be aware of open source security risks and how to mitigate them. Some of the ways in which you can protect yourself and your organization from Open Source Security Risks are:
1. Use Proper Tools
Deployment of DevSec teams can be beneficial for seamlessly including safety aspects in Software Development Lifecycles (SDLC). This can help developers correctly incorporate open-source applications from the very beginning. Having experts in security on board also means having guidance for evaluating and reducing risks related to components employed. Moreover, tools such as DAST or SAST enable to scan of these elements for identifying potential vulnerabilities. Thanks to these tools, it is possible to thoroughly check open-source code prior to and during its usage in an automated way.
2. Create Comprehensive Policies
Good policies should consider the history of an open-source component, including issue density, release frequency, and response times to problem identification and patching. It is particularly important to understand how strong the community is behind a project, as this will provide insight into the type of support they can expect. By enforcing these policies and guiding developers in making decisions about individual components or large codebases, organizations can maintain secure systems that operate efficiently.
Ways To Mitigate Open Source Risk
As technology becomes increasingly complex, companies must proactively protect against vulnerabilities and malware in open source code. In addition, organizations need to stay ahead of criminals who are attempting to exploit weaknesses in the software they use. To ensure security and minimize risk, companies must undertake four specific measures:
Taking preventive action toward safeguarding corporate IT infrastructure will help organizations create a secure environment while maintaining business continuity. Therefore, 4 ways to mitigate Open Source Risk are:
1. Create And Enforce Security Policies
Companies must have policies in place that control and monitor the manner in which developers access and use open source libraries. Such guidelines will ensure that all programming teams comply with rules surrounding downloading and integrating outside code into projects.
Furthermore, these regulations could help guard against potential infractions of intellectual property and licensing laws. In addition, clear policies would limit the risk of using outdated or insecure code that could eventually lead to system vulnerabilities or other cyber-security concerns. Companies must recognize how necessary it is to protect their applications by taking measures to properly govern the usage of open source libraries.
2. Understand What Open Source Libraries Are Used And Their Vulnerabilities
Corporate success is often dependent on the efficiency of an organization's processes. Countless hours can be wasted or directed ineffectively without specialized static analysis. This assessment can help companies identify gaps and alleviate issues related to portfolio management, software lifecycle, and error detection.
Those same companies have access to the insight specialized static analysis offers, allowing them to streamline and optimize vital operations relatively easily. All businesses can improve problem resolution and time management through advanced evaluation methods. With a complete understanding of the key elements that move their business forward, organizations keep valuable resources available for future efforts.
3. Update Vulnerable Libraries
Teams responsible for application security and developers must collaborate closely, as updating libraries can result in some applications crashing. However, if developers do not use the segments of a library that are vulnerable, they may not necessarily require to carry out an update. By cooperating together and utilizing this approach, companies can ensure their applications remain secure while saving time and resources.
4. Mitigate Malware
The best defense against malware is to put warning systems in place for developers relying on vulnerable libraries, as well as a policy of enforcement related to Continuous Integration servers. This will build a barrier around the code by triggering automated fails whenever a risky open source element is used. Working together in this way, our security measures can stop malicious software before it even reaches production.
Mitigate Open Source Risk With Scantist
Related Blogs
Find out how we’ve helped organisations like you
The Urgent Need for Vigilance in the Software Supply Chain
In an era where digital infrastructure underpins nearly every aspect of our lives, from banking, automotive to healthcare, the integrity of our software supply chain has never been more critical. Recent data from cybersecurity experts paints a stark picture: software supply chain attacks are occurring at an alarming rate of one every two days in 2024. This surge in attacks, targeting U.S. companies and IT providers most frequently, poses a severe threat to national security and economic stability.
